Ultrasonic Espresso: How Sound Waves Are Cutting Coffee's Energy Bill by 75%

For as long as espresso has existed, its defining ritual has been the same: hot water, forced under high pressure through finely ground coffee, in about thirty seconds. That heat and pressure are what most of us assume are non-negotiable, the whole reason espresso tastes the way it does. In June 2026, a research team at UNSW Sydney's School of Chemical Engineering, led by Dr Francisco Trujillo, published findings in the Journal of Food Engineering suggesting that assumption might not hold. They built what they call an "ultrasonic espresso," a brewing process that produces espresso-strength coffee using room-temperature water in two to three minutes, while cutting energy use by roughly 75%.

Sound Instead of Steam

The mechanism at the heart of the breakthrough is acoustic cavitation, the same physical phenomenon that shows up across a growing range of ultrasonic food and beverage applications. High-frequency sound waves are driven into a slurry of cold water and ground coffee, generating millions of microscopic bubbles that form and collapse in rapid succession. When those bubbles collapse near the coffee particles, they produce tiny, forceful microjets powerful enough to pit and fracture the grounds themselves. That physical disruption dramatically speeds up how quickly flavor compounds, oils, and caffeine move out of the coffee and into the water, without needing heat.

The effect on extraction speed is dramatic. A process that would traditionally take 12 to 24 hours, the kind of long, slow steeping used for cold brew, can be compressed into under three minutes using ultrasound. For espresso specifically, the team found their sweet spot for ultrasound application was around two and a half to three minutes, delivering a concentrated, espresso-strength result without ever heating the water.

Getting the Formula Right

Trujillo's team spent considerable time refining the process before landing on those results. Two variables mattered most. The first was brew ratio, how much water is used per gram of coffee. Get that wrong, and the drink either comes out too diluted or fails to extract properly. The second was grind size. Finer grinds gave the ultrasound more surface area to work on and noticeably improved results: at the finest grind size tested, roughly 325 microns, ultrasound-assisted brewing reached an extraction yield of 18.03%, comfortably inside the range considered ideal for espresso. The same grind, brewed without ultrasound under otherwise identical conditions, reached only 16.26%, short of that target. Across every grind size the team tested, conventional brewing without ultrasound consistently failed to reach optimal extraction values, even when the brew time was extended.

That gap matters, because extraction yield is one of the main technical measures of whether a cup of coffee has been brewed well: too little extraction and the coffee tastes weak or sour; too much and it turns bitter or over-extracted. Hitting that narrow optimal band using cold water alone, without the help of heat or pressure, is the specific technical achievement the study centers on.

Does It Actually Taste Like Espresso?

None of this would matter to an everyday coffee drinker if the result tasted noticeably different, so the researchers built a blind sensory test around exactly that question. Around 100 regular coffee drinkers, not trained tasters or industry judges, sampled four types of coffee without being told which was which: traditional espresso, ultrasound-brewed espresso, traditional filter coffee, and ultrasound-brewed filter coffee.

For espresso, the results were about as strong a validation as the researchers could have hoped for. Participants reported no statistically significant differences between the traditional and ultrasound-brewed versions across every measure tested, including aroma, flavor, bitterness, and overall liking. For filter coffee, the ultrasound-brewed version didn't just match the traditional version; it actually scored higher in overall preference. In other words, replacing heat and pressure with sound didn't cost the coffee anything in taste, and for filter coffee, participants preferred it.

Where This Technology Could Actually Go?

Beyond the espresso machine on your counter, the team is positioning this primarily as a manufacturing technology. Because the ultrasonic process produces concentrated, espresso-strength coffee on demand, it's well suited to industrial applications: ready-to-drink bottled coffee, coffee-based beverage manufacturing, and coffee concentrate that can be shipped in bulk and diluted later into a range of drinks, from cold brew to milk-based coffee beverages. For companies producing coffee drinks at scale, cutting both brewing time and energy consumption by that much has an obvious commercial appeal that goes well beyond flavor.

But the underlying principle of using sound waves rather than heat to accelerate extraction is exactly the kind of technique that ultrasonic culinary education has been building a case for. Ultrasound's usefulness in the kitchen has never been limited to one job. The same acoustic cavitation effect driving this coffee research is already being applied across drying, extraction, emulsification, tenderizing, and fermentation- the broader toolkit that organizations like the Ultrasonic Chef™ movement and the International Ultrasonic Culinary Association have spent years teaching to chefs and food producers. Coffee brewing is simply the newest, and most publicly visible, proof that the technique holds up under rigorous, peer-reviewed testing.

That's a meaningful point for anyone following the space professionally. It's one thing for a culinary program to argue that ultrasound has untapped potential in food and beverage preparation. It's another to see a university engineering department independently validate the same underlying mechanism cavitation-driven extraction in a completely different application, with a 100-person blind taste test to back it up. Educational efforts like Copenhagen Culinary Center's Ultrasonic Culinary Academy, which already frames extraction as one of the foundational applications of sonication in food and drink, sit squarely in the path of where this kind of research is heading.

What This Doesn't Prove, Yet

It's worth being fair about the limits of what's been demonstrated so far. This was a laboratory-developed process, built around a research-grade ultrasonic transducer attachment and carefully controlled variables: brew ratio, grind size, and precise ultrasound application time that the team spent significant effort optimizing. It isn't yet a consumer product sitting on shelves, and Trujillo's team has been explicit that their next step is refining the technology for broader commercial and industrial use, not necessarily home kitchens.

That distinction matters for anyone excited about brewing "ultrasonic espresso" at home tomorrow morning. The proof of concept is real and independently peer-reviewed. However, the leap from a chemical engineering lab to a consumer coffee machine or a professional kitchen sonicator is still ahead. What the study does confirm, convincingly, is that the physics behind ultrasonic extraction can replace heat and pressure without sacrificing taste, at least for coffee. That's a significant technical result in its own right, even before commercial machines exist to put it into everyday use.

Why It's Bigger Than Coffee

Step back from the espresso machine, and the real story here is about energy. Espresso, cold brew, and most extraction-based food processes have historically depended on heat to move quickly, and heat is expensive, both financially and environmentally, at industrial scale. A method that gets the same extraction result at room temperature, in a fraction of the time, using nothing more exotic than sound waves, is the kind of result that pushes an entire category of food and beverage manufacturing to reconsider its energy assumptions.

For an industry increasingly focused on sustainability, a technique that cuts brewing energy by roughlythree-quarterss while producing a product tasters can't distinguish from the original is difficult to ignore. And for the growing community of chefs, educators, and food scientists already working with ultrasound through programs like the Ultrasonic Chef™ curriculum and the International Ultrasonic Culinary Association's ongoing advocacy for sonication in professional kitchens this study is one more independent, peer-reviewed data point in a case that keeps getting stronger: sound waves are turning out to be a genuinely versatile tool in the modern kitchen, not a novelty confined to a handful of niche applications.

Coffee may end up being remembered as the moment that case became impossible to dismiss.....LEARN MORE

Ultrasonic Institute ™ is the professional department of Copenhagen Culinary Center, also known as the Ultrasonic

Culinary Academy ™. Ultrasonic Chef ™ is the official worldwide trademark and brand name of all our masterclasses,

certifications and ultrasonic cooking equipment offered in cooperation with the International Ultrasonic Culinary

Association in Denmark

CoCuCe.dk ™ is the simplified consumer education course offered by Copenhagen Culinary Center about fermentation,

ultrasound cooking and the importance of gut health in a Psychobiotic diet - Rewiring Mood Through Food ™

Copenhagen Culinary Center is the first in the world to offer standalone masterclasses in Ultrasound-Assisted

Extraction UAE and Ultrasound-Assisted Fermentation UAF to both professional chefs and private consumers. More

than 70 internet domains are registered worldwide to protect our concept and trademarks.

Copyright 2026 © All rights reserved by Copenhagen Culinary Center